report/report.md. A separate judge model scores the report against a weighted checklist derived from the target study.
How it works
Inference and judging
- Prepare the task. AgentCompass downloads the dataset when necessary, creates an isolated workspace, uploads the task’s
data/andrelated_work/materials, and writes the complete instructions. - Run the research agent. A search-oriented agent such as ResearchHarness drives the model through research, coding, analysis, and report writing. The required artifact is
report/report.md; figures may be written anywhere under the task workspace. - Judge the report. The benchmark reads the report and generated images, then asks
judge_modelto score every text or image checklist item on a 0–100 scale. Image criteria compare generated figures with the target-study figure, so the judge must support image input when such criteria are present.
Checklist score
Each checklist item has a weight. The task score is the weighted mean of all item scores, from 0 to 100. A task is markedcorrect when its score is at least pass_threshold and the harness run completed without error. The aggregate metric is mean_score, averaged across evaluated tasks.
Parameters
Pass benchmark configuration with--benchmark-params '{...}', or place it under benchmark.params in the YAML supplied to --config; command-line values take precedence.
Parameter reference
| Parameter | Type | Default | Choices / values | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
judge_model | dict | null | {id, base_url, api_key, api_protocol, params} | Judge model spec, required. It scores the checklist and is separate from the model under test. |
category | string / list | ”all" | "all”, one category, or a list | Filter tasks by the category prefix in the task id; a list takes the union. |
pass_threshold | float | 50.0 | 0–100 | Minimum weighted checklist score required for correct=true. |
max_generated_images | int | 5 | integer ≥ 0 | Maximum generated figures sent to the judge for each image checklist item. |
Judge model spec
judge_model is a complete model spec: {"id","base_url","api_key","api_protocol","params"}. Put judge inference options under params. Use the same judge configuration across all models being compared; changing the judge changes the scoring standard. Because some checklist items include target and generated figures, choose a multimodal judge that supports the configured API protocol.
Run examples
Run configuration is split into two JSON blocks:--benchmark-params carries ResearchClawBench configuration (judge model, filtering, and scoring), while --harness-params carries ResearchHarness configuration (service credentials and execution limits). Both can also be written under benchmark.params and harness.params in --config.
The examples pass Serper, Jina, and MinerU credentials as environment-variable references. Set SERPER_API_KEY, JINA_API_KEY, and MINERU_TOKEN before running.
- Smoke test (single task end-to-end)
- Custom parameters
- AgentCompass recommended config
Verify the end-to-end flow works —
sample_ids selects which case to run, with all other parameters using their defaults.Outputs
A run writes aggregate metrics and per-task details underresults/researchclawbench/<model>/<run>/.
Aggregate metrics (summary.md)
summary.md contains the run counts (Total, Evaluated, and Error) and the headline metric mean_score: the arithmetic mean of the 0–100 weighted checklist score for all evaluated tasks. Category-level mean scores are included when categories are present.
Per-task details (details/)
Each task JSON records the taskscore, correct verdict, final report answer, trajectory, and harness artifacts. The checklist grading is stored under attempts[*].meta.scoring, including total_score, total_weight, and every item’s type, weight, score, reasoning, and error information.